"Phenomena of precautionary censorship on Facebook", complain with a question submitted to the Parliament, 47 deputies of SYRIZA, headed by Euclid Tsakalotos, calling on the government to take an initiative at international level, for the unimpeded exercise of freedom of expression .
Addressing the Undersecretary of State under the Prime Minister Theodore Livanios and the Minister of Digital Government Kyriakos Pierrakakis, the questioning MPs report that recently even professional photojournalists have been posted, protesting against the government and protesting against the government. of Dimitris Koufontinas.
The content of the question is as follows:
"According to Article 14 of the Constitution" Everyone can express and disseminate orally, in writing and through the press his thoughts in compliance with the laws of the State. The press is free. "Censorship and any other precautionary measures are prohibited."
However, in the last few days we have been witnessing an unprecedented and unacceptable censorship on social media, specifically on the facebook.com website.
In recent days, there have been a number of complaints about the removal of posts or even the "freezing" of user accounts, following posts about the hunger strike of prisoner Dimitris Koufontinas and the attitude of the Government and not his criminal action before his imprisonment.
More specifically, these users received messages such as "It looks like something you posted does not follow our Community Standards" or "Your post violates the terms of our community regarding dangerous individuals and dangerous organizations." There were also complaints of account restriction for seven days.
Indicatively, posts by professional photojournalists where they include the subject of their work have disappeared, as happened in posts by Marios Lolos, Tatiana Bolari, Lefteris Partsalis, Konstantinos Poulis and others. In fact, on 2.3.2021, an online event of the journalistic website ThePressProject was downloaded from the mentioned platform, in which the lawyer of the hunger striker, members of the Board of Directors, participate. of the Athens Bar Association and other lawyers.
The posts were aimed at protesting the government's handling of Dimitris Koufontinas' demands and hunger strike, and in no way encouraged dangerous actions or supported terrorist organizations.
The Hellenic Photojournalists Association issued an announcement on Tuesday (2/3) denouncing censorship of its members by the Facebook platform, while after mass reactions from users, the posts were restored with the media representative stating: "Although great progress is being made in the system For us, these do not cease to be imperfect, with the result that in some cases mistakes are made, as happened in this case. "The content that was accidentally removed was restored when it was found." The above fact proves the claim that there was - intentionally or unintentionally - censorship and not a violation of the terms of the community of the social networking platform.
The same kind of censorship was applied to hundreds of posts and comments by ordinary users. Indicatively, one of the comments censored was by the well-known author D. Sarantakos on the profile of the President of the Republic with the following content:
"Dear Mr. President of the Republic, it would be tragic for the country, unjust for you and a blow to the rule of law to tarnish your presidency with the first dead hunger striker.
"With all the courage of the great esteem towards you, I exorcise you to take a stand in favor of the rights of the hunger striker D. Koufontina."
This censorship occurs at the same time that citizens are locked in their homes due to a pandemic and the vast majority of the country's media are completely aligned with the government.
In Greece, for example, before the 2019 elections, Facebook has assigned the fact checking of the Greek news (fact checking) to the NGO Ellinika Hoaxes to a company that does not have the same specialization and experience with its respective Facebook partners in other countries. , such as AFP and the AssociatedPress.
In this context, the newspaper "AVGI" sent a question to the company Facebook and the Greek partner companies asking: By what procedure does facebook control the content? What role does your company play in this process?
• Have you noticed an increase in complaints from other users about such posts?
• Has a relevant keyword been included in the "algorithm" of facebook, as a result of which the posts that include it are automatically "cut"?
The above newspaper received the following response from Facebook:
"Terrorists, violent extremist groups and hate organizations have no place on Facebook and Instagram. In accordance with our policy on Dangerous Persons and Organizations, we prohibit members of terrorist organizations, such as Mr. Koufontinas, from using our platforms, and we exclude posts that endorse or support these individuals and their actions whenever we receive them. relevant knowledge. "Neutral stance regarding terrorist groups and informing the media about their actions are not against our rules."
And all this is happening while the European Directive 1808/2018, which was incorporated in the Greek legal order just a few days ago with law 4779/2021, protects the freedom of expression on the internet, "which is a cornerstone of any democratic system", the information and pluralism (for example, see Figs. 15 and 49 of the Preamble to the Directive)
The above must be seen in the light of the fact that the enormous inequalities recorded in who owns and how they use information have a dramatic effect on democracy itself. The increasingly explored gap of these inequalities is in stark contrast to democratic governance.
Censorship is an undemocratic and unconstitutional act.
Freedom of speech is a vital element of democracy.
Social networking sites are one of the few remaining sites where all views are freely expressed.
Protests in favor of the life of a hunger striker and the satisfaction of his request are in no way acts of applause for those convicted of terrorism or other criminal offenses.
The precautionary ban on publications - even those we would all condemn together - by a public or private body leads our democracy to very dangerous paths.
The following questions are asked:
1) Has any instruction / recommendation / encouragement been given, in writing or orally, to the Facebook company or to companies cooperating with it so that no comments / posts / photos are published related to current issues such as the hunger strike of D. Koufontinas?
2) Do they consider the phenomena of censorship unacceptable and condemnable? What actions will they take so that they will not be repeated?
3) Do they intend to take steps to ensure the smooth exercise of freedom of expression on social media and the internet in general? If so, what are they?
4) What initiatives does the Government intend to take, both domestically and internationally, in order to increase the accountability and transparency of the companies that manage a public space so important for the free and unhindered circulation of information and ideas? "How are civil rights and freedom of expression guaranteed?"